Text
1.The judgment of the first instance, including the claims extended in the trial, shall be modified as follows:
The Defendants respectively.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. The facts of recognition (1) around June 3, 201, Defendant B, an engineer of Defendant Northern Transport Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Northern Transport”), was driving the bus owned by Defendant Northern Transport Co., Ltd. on June 3, 201, and the Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno-ro 4 driving the three-lanes of the four-lanes of the road near the intersection in the direction of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the road of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the road of the parallel of the parallel of the road of the parallel of the parallel of the city of the parallel of the road of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the road of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the road of the parallel of the parallel of the road of the parallel of the parallel of the road of the parallel of the intersection of the road of the parallel of the road of the parallel of the road of the road.
(2) At the time of the instant accident, the Plaintiff got a bus knife at the time of the instant accident, but made a call using a mobile phone at the time of the instant accident.
In addition, at the time of the instant accident, approximately 20 passengers were on board the bus, but only the Plaintiff suffered injury as above due to the instant accident.
(3) The Defendant National Federation of Bus Transport Business Associations (hereinafter “Defendant Federation”) is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile mutual aid agreement with Defendant North-west Transport Business.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 2, 3, 4, 9, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 and the purport of the whole pleadings
B. According to the fact of recognition of liability, Defendant B is a tort, and Defendant B is an operator of the above bus or an employer of Defendant B, and Defendant Federation is an insurer of the above bus, and the Plaintiff was incurred due to the instant accident.