A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

On May 24, 2015, from around 01:40 to around 03:38 of the same day, the Defendant stolen the property of each victim and the victim E and the victim F, by taking out one gallonal phone of an amount equivalent to 400,000 won at the market price of the victim D, the market price of which was owned by the victim D, who was in an unfluored thing inside the slope, from May 24, 2015, from around 01:40 to around 03:38 of the same day, the Defendant used one galtholand of an amount equivalent to 50,000 won at the market price of the victim E owned by each victim, and one galtho road of an amount equivalent to 90,000 won at the market price of the victim F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written statement of F, D, and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and the proviso of Article 50 and Article 42 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Although the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on probation and community service order had been punished twice by a fine for the same kind of crime, the crime is not committed again in the crime of this case. However, it is judged as ordered in full view of all the reasons for sentencing, including the fact that damaged articles were temporarily returned to the victims and have no actual damage, and in some cases the victims want to have the Defendant’s preference.