The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. On November 28, 2013, the Defendant, together with C, sustained a trial expense as a matter of witnessing E in voting at the election of representatives of each Dong from the D apartment 1313 Dong-ro, Yongsan-si, Suwon-si around 16:00 on November 28, 2013, and C was also closely sealed the body of E intending to bring E out of E, and the Defendant also sustained an injury, such as the salt shack, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment to E, by combining it with C.

2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the records of the instant case, namely, the witness at the site at the time of the instant case stated to the effect that “the Defendant was unable to see E”, there is no direct evidence to acknowledge that the Defendant was sealed a victim in the street, other than the witness’s statement, there is any part in which the witness’s statement and the witness’s statement are inconsistent with E, and the relationship between the Defendant and E, it is insufficient to recognize that the witness at the site had inflicted an injury on E in collaboration with C as recorded in the judgment of the Defendant, and there is no other evidence to prove the facts charged of the instant case.

3. In conclusion, since the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, a judgment of innocence is rendered under the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and a summary of judgment is publicly announced under Article 58(2)