beta
Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the factual error) is as follows: (a) the Defendant: (b) sold the insurance by selling the victim’s four-year employees at the time and place indicated in the instant facts charged; and (c) sold the insurance; (b) sold the body of the fourth year; and (c) sold the insurance. The Defendant was not aware that the Defendant was “a person who received money in advance of several years,” and was guilty of this part of the facts charged, but there was an error of misapprehending the facts and affecting the conclusion of
2. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court, the facts charged in the instant case are sufficiently recognized that the Defendant damaged the reputation of the victim by stating that “the victim’s employees and the victim sold their body and sold their insurance” in the presence of an elementary school.
The defendant's assertion of mistake is without merit.
① At around 07:00 on October 16, 201, the Defendant itself recognized the fact that: (a) the Defendant, from an investigative agency to this court, made the victim’s phrase “I, and at the same time, the four members would have engaged in the purchase of insurance only once when soliciting the purchase of insurance.”
② The victim consistently stated that, at an investigative agency’s time, at the same time and place as mentioned in the foregoing paragraph (1) to the court below’s trial, the Defendant sold insurance and sold its body in the four-year period and sold its insurance. The victim consistently stated that, “I would like to collect money from its members before several years,” the victim’s act of collecting money from its employees.”
The witness G of the lower court stated that the Defendant was aware that he would sell the “insurance” to the Defendant, and that he would do so, and that the witness H of the lower court also stated that he would be well aware of his memory, and that he would have been able to provide education, and that he was able to say that he was able to refer to the Defendant.
3. The defendant was raised from I.