A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

However, the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 21, 2009, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million with a fine of KRW 1.5 million for the same offense in Seoul Southern District Court, on February 21, 2014, as the same offense, in the support for the development of the source of water sources and the source of water sources, for the violation of the Road Traffic Act.

A person who violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act not less than twice again on March 15, 2018, the Defendant, as above, driven a sports vehicle in the Ccoin with approximately 0.05% alcohol concentration at the section of approximately 1.2km from the Do in front of the distance of bank trees in Geumcheon-dong, Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to the road located in B general housing in Geumcheon-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government.

2. On March 15, 2018, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (i.e., a flight vehicle) returned to the left at the speed of a middle school of 50 U.S. in the state of alcohol concentration of 0.055% in blood while driving a sports vehicle at Croccoon around 21:20 on the 15th, 2018 and making it difficult for Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to turn to the left at the speed of the 50-gilh from the beginning of a mountain-ro to the direction from

At the time, it is at night and at the front of that place, only a yellow flickering signal is installed. In such a case, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to care in preventing accidents by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brake system of the motor vehicle and accurately manipulating the steering direction and brake system of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the defendant was negligent in proceeding with the right side without properly examining the front side and the right side of the defendant, and the victim D (26) who crossed the crosswalk from the right side of the defendant's proceeding to the left side of the defendant's front part of the defendant's vehicle and let the victim go beyond the road.

Ultimately, even though the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc. in need of treatment for about three weeks, due to the above occupational process and room, the Defendant immediately stopped and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement in court;