The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence imposed by the court below (one year of imprisonment and additional collection) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is a favorable condition that the defendant confessions all of the crimes of this case and reflects the fact that the defendant should support his/her family, etc. However, the defendant has been punished seven times (six times of imprisonment with prison labor, six times of suspended execution, one time of suspended execution) for the same crime. The defendant is sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for the same crime, and the defendant is not aware of the fact that he/she administered phiphones under paragraph (1) of the judgment of the court below, and he/she is discovered to have been administered for phiphones under paragraph (2) of the judgment of the court below, and thereafter, he/she seems to have poor quality of the crime. The scope of the recommended sentence of the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court for each crime of this case [basic crime and concurrent crime: three types (3) such as medication and simple possession of narcotics crime group, each aggravated factor of the previous punishment - the area of aggravated punishment, one year and four years of imprisonment with prison labor, and three years or more (3) years of recommendation of the defendant, and circumstances of this case.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.