A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power” On November 8, 2010, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 2 million at the Daejeon District Court to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, to a fine of KRW 5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, to the Daejeon District Court on December 11, 2015, to a summary order of KRW 5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and to a fine of KRW 8 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Daejeon District Court’s Seosan Branch Support on July 8, 2016, respectively.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Violation of the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) is the person engaged in driving freight B.

On November 6, 2019, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle on the 18:51st day of November, 2019, and led C to the direction from the bend side of the bend.

The location is a bend, bend, and a bend, of the first line, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the front and rear left, and accurately manipulating the steering system of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and caused the back part of the victim D (ma, 67 years old) driving, which was driven by the defendant due to the negligence of driving the above cargo while under the influence of 0.142% alcohol concentration, to be the front part of the above cargo vehicle of the defendant's driving.

Ultimately, while driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant suffered injury, such as salt, tension, etc., in need of approximately two weeks of treatment by negligence on duty, while driving the motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol.

2. The Defendant was driving the Poter Ⅱ as stated in paragraph (1) of the Road Traffic Act while under the influence of alcohol by 0.142% at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) of the same Article.

Accordingly, the defendant was driven under the influence of alcohol not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1.Each of D. D.