logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.10.20 2016고단2345
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On July 11, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Sungnam Branch of Suwon District Court as a summary order of KRW 2 million for the same crime. On November 6, 2008, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 2 million for the same crime.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around July 19:40 on July 1, 2016, the Defendant driven a CPoter Ⅱ in the influence of alcohol content 0.187% from a section of about 200 meters, from the road in front of the community credit cooperative engaging in the act of drinking in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si to the front road of Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, and around 19:50 on the same day, while under the influence of alcohol content 0.187%.

As a result, the defendant, who committed a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at least twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again.

2. Violation of the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) is the person engaged in driving freight C Ⅱ.

On July 1, 2016, at around 19:50, the Defendant driven the foregoing cargo vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, as described in paragraph 1, and led to the front of the Mag-gu Mag-gu Mag-gu Mag-ro Mag-ro from the direction of the central hospital distance to the direction of the short distance.

At the time, the E SP car driven by the victim D(W, 33 years old) was parked in one lane in front of the vehicle driven by the defendant, waiting for the left-hand turn turn, and the defendant found it and tried to change the lane from the first lane to the second lane, so there was a duty of care to accurately manipulate the steering and brakes to prevent accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drive normally due to the above influence of alcohol and neglected to do so, and caused the Defendant to have the part of the damaged vehicle under stop to the right side of the left side of the said cargo vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant above.

arrow