The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the charge is as follows: (a) on March 15, 2013, the Defendant damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out the following facts: “At around 10:30,00, more than 10 residents of the Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan Office of Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, including C et al., listened to the victim D, who drinked this apartment before 4,5 years after finding out what person was the frontliner. In the event of the installation of CCTV, it was known that the CCTV was installed at KRW 10,00,000.”

2. The above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 307(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 312(2) of the same Act. According to the records, it is evident that the victim withdraws his/her wish to punish the defendant on October 7, 2013, which was after the prosecution of this case was instituted. Thus, the prosecution against the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.