logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.03.31 2016고합36
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)등
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. On September 18, 2014, the summary of the facts charged was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act at the Seoul Southern District Court on March 24, 2015 and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 2015. On January 20, 2016, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced two years of suspended sentence to imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of fraud at the Seoul Southern District Court, which became final and conclusive on January 28, 2016.

F Co., Ltd. was established on July 15, 2005 for the purpose of manufacturing cosmetics, wholesale retail business, etc., and changed its trade name to G with the lead of the defendant on April 23, 2012. The defendant was appointed as a director of G Co., Ltd. around April 23, 2012.

In fact, the Defendant did not have graduated from the department of pharmacy at the Gyeonggi High School and the department of pharmacy at the Seoul University, and graduated from the department of pharmacy at the same college of pharmacy at the same college of pharmacy without having obtained the master’s degree and the doctor’s degree at the same college of pharmacy, or graduated from the department of pharmacy at the Gyeonggi High School and the department of pharmacy at the Seoul University of pharmacy at the same college of pharmacy, and graduated from the department of pharmacy at the same college of pharmacy with German maintenance brik as if he obtained the doctor’s degree and the doctor’s degree at the same college of pharmacy. On March 15, 2012, the Defendant changed the name of J Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “K”) introduced through the representative director I of H on March 29, 2013.

L by deceiving the representative director L of the victim company (hereinafter referred to as "victim company") as if the above experience was true.

[B] On March 21, 2012, the Defendant, at the victim company office located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around March 21, 2012, provided for KRW 300 million as research funds as it is necessary to develop new materials by using undisclosed technology, to L of the victim company’s representative director who is accused of such act. Instead, the Defendant would take 60,000 shares of M company held by the Defendant.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

arrow