logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2019.07.12 2019고단1863
공전자기록등불실기재등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On April 18, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment for special robbery at Seoul High Court, and completed the execution of the said sentence on August 1, 2016.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Single-criminal conduct;

A. The Defendant, through a false entry into public electronic records, etc., and a false entry and electronic recording event, proposed “BO” from BP operating a gambling site through a name-free box, with the intention to establish a “age-long corporation (company with no body)” by stating that “if a passbook is created in the name of the corporation, the fee for the use of the passbook will be paid.”

On October 25, 2016, the Defendant filed an application for the registration of incorporation of a corporate director with the authority to register the incorporation of the Suwon District Court as “A”, “B Q”, “AZ Co., Ltd.”, “AZ Co., Ltd.”, “Members BR, Underground BS, and SS”, “10,000,000 won”, “communication parts and sales business, etc.,” and “AZ Co., Ltd., Ltd., the purpose of which is “A”.

However, in fact, the Defendant: (a) received a promise from the above BO, and applied for the establishment of the above corporation for the purpose of transfer, and (b) did not intend to establish and operate a corporation with the purpose of telecommunication parts and malicious sales business; and (c) the above company was a 'defluence company', not for the actual business, which was a 'defluence company' and was a 'defluence company' and was a 'defluence company', which was neither prepared by the articles of incorporation nor appointed by the directors

Nevertheless, the defendant filed an application for registration of incorporation as above and had the public official in charge of the above registration and the public official belonging thereto enter the above registered matters in the commercial register computer system and had them keep them at that time.

In this respect, the defendant made a false report to record false facts in the commercial register computer system, which is the same electronic records as the original of a notarial deed, and exercised it.

(b).

arrow