1. The plaintiffs' respective claims against the defendants are dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties 1) A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “A”), and the Plaintiff Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff Co., Ltd.”).

(2) A corporation is a corporation established for the purpose of research on pharmacological and scambling of self-processed plants, development and manufacturing of food raw materials and pharmaceutical products, and other business of manufacturing and selling the product of this case as its raw materials under the Food Sanitation Act and other processed products under the Food Sanitation Act, which are tea and yeast wheat yeast, yeast yeast yeast yeast yeast yeast yeast, yeast yeast yeast yeast yeast yeast yeast yeast yeast yeast yeast yeast. (2) Plaintiff C is a corporation established for the purpose of manufacturing and selling natural antibiotics products, manufacture and selling of pharmaceutical products and animal additives, manufacture and sale of food additives and functional additives, yeast chemical and organic chemical products.

3) Defendant D Press is the J business entity performing duties, such as television broadcasts, and Defendant E is the reporter of Defendant D Press, who coverage and reported the instant product, and Defendant F, G, and H (hereinafter “Defendant Police Officers”).

(B) Police officers belonging to the Seoul Gangseo-gu Police Station who are responsible for the investigation of the instant product. (B) Defendant F, on June 2016, after visiting the intelligence team office of the Seoul Gangseo-gu Police Station, Defendant F, the Internet and Hanwon, sold the instant product as health food, non-bred-treatment food at the Internet and Hanwon-won. The instant product was submitted voluntarily, without indicating the date of manufacture, ingredients, distribution period, manufacturer, etc., and verified the composition analysis, drug analysis, etc. of each of the instant products to the National Science Investigation Agency on June 22, 2016.

2. On July 7, 2016, the National Institute of Science and Investigative (hereinafter referred to as the "Institute") made a summary appraisal that the drug was not detected in each of the above products.