1. The Defendants deliver to the Plaintiff the buildings listed in the attached list.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Defendants.

3...

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On July 27, 2017, the Plaintiff renewed the lease agreement on the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant apartment”), which is the Defendant A and public rental housing units (hereinafter “instant apartment”). On July 27, 201, the Plaintiff entered into an agreement on the termination as follows in the said agreement:

Article 10 (Cancellation and Termination of Lease Contracts) (1) Where a lessee commits any of the following acts, a lessor may cancel or terminate this contract, or refuse to renew the lease contract:

2. No lessee of public rental housing under Article 49-4 of the Special Act on Public Housing shall transfer his/her right of lease (including sale, purchase, gift, and all other acts resulting from the alteration of a right, but excluding inheritance) or sublease his/her public rental housing to any third person;

Provided, That in cases prescribed by Presidential Decree, such as work, occupation, treatment of diseases, etc., and where the consent of the public housing project operator has been obtained, it may be transferred or sublease the right to lease the public rental housing.

B. On July 27, 2017, the renewal date of the above lease agreement, Defendant A submitted an application for approval for the transfer of the right to lease of rental housing to C on the ground that he/she was scheduled to be employed as the city of Incheon and then transferred the right to lease of the instant apartment to C.

C. Around August 2017, the Plaintiff conducted a survey on the actual status of residents on the instant apartment. Under the circumstance that Defendant A did not obtain approval for transfer of right of lease, the Plaintiff: (a) prepared and submitted to the Management Office of the instant apartment with an occupant card that C resides in the instant apartment; and (b) confirmed that the vehicle under the name of Defendant B, a father of C, and the father of Defendant B, who is Defendant A, had access to the said apartment frequently after being registered.

The plaintiff is the defendant A around August 30, 2017.