logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.05.13 2014고단9592
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매)
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a person who operates a business with a trade name, “C” located in Suwon-gu B.

At around 12:30 on September 19, 2014, the Defendant: (a) received KRW 70,000 from a police officer who was found to be a customer in the above business place, and (b) took charge of shoulder and bridge by placing it on the bed, which is located in the bed, and (c) asked the police officer to answer “it is not necessary” and tried to get off the police officer’s panty in order to conduct a similar sexual intercourse; and (b) tried to make it a commercial sex act.

2. Article 2(1) of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. means the brokerage or convenience between the parties intending to engage in commercial sex acts.

However, in itself, the Defendant merely sought to engage in sexual traffic by itself against the police officer who pretended to be a sexual traffic customer, and did not engage in the act of arranging sexual traffic by connecting the “mediation” of sexual traffic with the above control police officer, namely, the intent of sexual traffic between the female and that of sexual traffic.

(B) (A) it is difficult to see that sexual traffic was conducted only with the Defendant’s attempt to panty by the above crackdown police officers, and the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. does not have a provision on punishment of attempted sexual traffic, so the Defendant’s act cannot be punished as sexual traffic.

arrow