The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The Defendant is a person who actually runs a “C” company that manufactures and sells non-pharmaceutical products, and the victim D is a person who actually runs a pharmaceutical wholesale and retail business with the trade name of “E”.

A. The Defendant, at the office of “E” located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F on October 27, 2015, may accept 5 items permission from the victim within 45 days of “within 45 days of permission for manufacturing non-pharmaceutical drugs.”

The cost of permission is KRW 10,000,000, and when the company is supplied by the company with the net container, which is the bareboat raw material, it will obtain permission for the "E".

“.......”

However, in fact, the Defendant was aware of the failure to meet the necessary conditions for the permission for the manufacturing business of non-pharmaceutical drugs, and did not have the intent or ability to obtain the said permission even if he received money from the injured party.

As above, the Defendant deceiving the victim and was transferred to a new bank account under the name of G for the purpose of obtaining permission from the injured party and making up for the advance payment of actual containers, KRW 3 million around October 28, 2015, KRW 10 million around November 2, 2015, KRW 200,000 around March 10, 2015, KRW 2 million around the same month, ④ KRW 5 million around November 11, 201.

B. On November 2015, 2015, the Defendant: “A company engaged in the manufacturing business may receive funds from the Korea Technology Finance Corporation or the Government-funded funds if the patent had been manufactured; however, the Defendant’s registration of a new design related to the bareboat was made to the Korean Intellectual Property Office only if it is received from the Korean Intellectual Property Office.

G. H. H. H. H.W.W. 6 million won.

However, the Defendant knew that the registration of a new design for his own device was unclear, and the above technology can easily be created by a person with ordinary knowledge, and cannot be registered as a new design, such as the existence of the same device. Therefore, even if the Defendant receives the above money from the injured party, the Defendant’s registration of a new design for the victim is registered.