logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.12.02 2015고단2863
절도
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On August 20, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to three months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny at the Incheon District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Incheon Detention House on October 21, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

On October 18, 2015, at around 00:48, the Defendant brought about KRW 250,00,00,00 in the market price of KRW 30,000,00,00,000, and KRW 1,50,000,00,000, and KRW 50,000,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, or more than 1,000,00,000, or more than 3,00,00,00

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of victim's written statement;

1. Statement in the investigation report (CCTV).

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of each Act or subordinate statute of criminal history records, inquiry reports (A), the same previous rulings, seven copies of the previous rulings, and investigation reports (verification of the date of release of a suspect);

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated offenders [Scope of Recommendation)] Reasons for the sentencing of Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes [The sentence of punishment] is favorable for the same repeated crime (a year to three years), which does not fall under the aggravated area (a special), [a] the person under special jurisdiction]: The defendant has already been punished for the same kind of crime, as well as the defendant has already been punished for several times, such as the confession of the crime in this case and the fact that the defendant was committed for a repeated crime due to the same crime at the time of the crime in this case, even though he had been committed for a repeated crime due to the same crime in this case, he did not know of it and led to the crime in this case. In full view of the circumstances under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, the degree of damage in this case, etc., the punishment shall be

arrow