All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. On the grounds of the Prosecutor’s appeal, the lower court reversed the first instance judgment convicting the Defendant on the charges of this case (excluding the part of conviction) and rendered a judgment of not guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning, on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

According to the records, the above judgment of the court below is just, and contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors in the misapprehension of facts or the misapprehension of relevant legal principles by exceeding the limit of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules.

On the other hand, the prosecutor appealed the entire judgment of the court below, but the guilty part does not indicate the grounds of objection against the petition of appeal or the reasoning of appeal.

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the relevant legal principles and the evidence duly admitted, the lower court was justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of aiding and abetting fraud on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the bounds of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, thereby exceeding the bounds of free evaluation of evidence, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on “the act of aiding and abetting

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.