All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment on the grounds of Defendant B’s appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court, based on its reasoning, was justifiable to have found Defendant B guilty of aiding and abetting fraud contained in the facts charged against Defendant B.

Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there is no error of law by misunderstanding facts beyond the limit of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles as to intentional or intentional act in the crime of aiding and abetting fraud.

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment regarding the prosecutor’s grounds for appeal in light of the records, the lower court, based on its reasoning, lack of evidence to acknowledge the Defendants as a joint principal offender as to the fraud among the facts charged against

It is reasonable to judge not guilty of aiding and abetting fraud included therein, and to judge not guilty of aiding and abetting fraud.

In so doing, contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there is no error of misapprehending the legal principles as to joint principal offenders by exceeding the limit of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules or by misapprehending the legal principles.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.