The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the head of the Suwon-si management office of the relevant Suwon-si C apartment.

At around 13:00 on December 18, 2012, the Defendant found D's complaint against D's inter-floor noise received before D's 104-dong 203, a resident of the above apartment building, for the purpose of confirming D's civil petition against D's interfloor noise received by telephone prior to D's 104-dong 203-dong 203.

현관문을 열고 나온 D는 피고인에게 ‘관리실에서 2년 동안 뭘 했느냐, 너희들이 뭔데 이렇게 소란을 피우느냐’라고 항의를 하며 고성을 질렀다.

The defendant divided D's two arms by force with double hand, and tried to inspect D's right shoulder and left-hand part of D's shoulder, which require D's treatment for about a week.

2. The judgment D consistently asserts that “A woman 304 was released from his arms he gets into his house while she gets out of his arms,” and that “A woman she was her own arms, and the Defendant, who was her fire extinguishers in his house, attempted to get out of his house by her own arms and putting them into his house with another hand after she was her own arms and again she tried to get out of the house, but her husband, who was her mother, left the house with her fire extinguisher, she was her mother and her mother, and she turned out into the first floor childcare center.”

이에 대하여 피고인 역시, ‘D의 집 현관에 이르자 D가 자신의 멱살과 목 부분을 잡아 흔들고 고함을 치면서 집 안으로 끌고 들어가려고 하였는데, D의 집안에 끌려가면 봉변을 당할까 봐 벽을 잡고 버텼고, 이에 D가 현관에 놓아둔 소화기를 들고 자신에게 내리치려고 해 D의 팔목을 잡고 소화기를 빼앗아 제자리에 놓은 후 1층으로 내려갔다’고 일관되게 주장하고 있다.

As such, since the arguments of D and the defendant conflict with each other, the issue of this case is whether the defendant arrived at the present position of D and what kind of events occurred between D and the defendant.

this Court.