Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, by a fine of 1,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A’s criminal act is a person who acts as an “E” organization, which is a violent organization that is engaged in activities based on the Bongdong-dong of Busan Suwon-gu.

The Defendant was aware of the fact that the Victim F (Y, 53 years old) tried to operate an entertainment drinking house under the trade name of “H” in the Busan-gu G G, Busan-gu, and the Defendant and I were forced to employ employees under the pretext of protecting other violent researchers from other violent groups on the ground that the Defendant and I act as an organization of “E”, and conspired with B to receive monthly money as the cost of protection.

On January 2013, the Defendant found the “H” entertainment drinking house operated by the Victim F of the Victim G in Busan-gu Busan-gu, Busan-gu, and the Defendant was the “E” investigator, and the “B, in order to carry on funeral on the floor, was unable to carry a funeral if he does not carry a tin-to-face, and entered another tin-to-beer without having a tin-to-be box, and without having his own demand, entered the tin-to-beer, and she was frighted to mobilize organized violence and interfere with the main business and to inflict any injury on the victim.

Therefore, the Defendant, jointly with B, threatened the victim with B, and received two million won from the victim frighting to the Busan Bank account in the name of J, the birth of the said I, as the cost of protecting the business place.

B. Around February 20, 2013, the Defendant continued with B to introduce employees to work at the above main place in the entertainment drinking house in cooperation with B, and demanded the victim to change the introduction fee. As such, the Defendant received 500,000 won in cash from the victim, who was frighten and fright to work at the above main place.

2. The Defendant committed the crime by Defendant B, while the Victim F was not well-grounded in the business of the said “H”, did not pay the employees who introduced the Defendant’s pay.