1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against Defendant D Co., Ltd. in excess of the money ordered to be paid below.

1. Defendant C asserts that, among the instant lawsuits, the part of the claim against Plaintiff CR and Defendant C among the instant lawsuits was filed by an attorney who did not have the power of attorney delegated by the said Plaintiffs, the determination on this safety defense is unlawful.

According to the evidence evidence Nos. 91, 92, and 93, it can be recognized that the plaintiff CR (former name: EO) and BC legally delegate the plaintiffs' attorney's right to represent the lawsuit of this case. Thus, the defendant C's main defense of safety is without merit.

2. Judgment on the merits

A. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows.

Inasmuch as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, the same shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance which dismissed or added both the Plaintiffs are all “Plaintiffs and the co-Plaintiffs of the court of first instance.”

Defendant A Co-Defendant A Co-Defendant A (hereinafter “Defendant A”) in Part 3 of the judgment of the first instance court is called “Co-Defendant A” in Part 18.

Defendant B Co-Defendant B Co-Defendant B of the first instance trial of “Defendant B” (hereinafter “Defendant B”) on the 3rd and 21st of the judgment of the first instance court.

Defendant B, who is not more than Grade 3 of the judgment of the first instance court, is both "Defendant B" and "Co-Defendant B of the first instance court."

On the 4th judgment of the first instance court, Defendant A, who is not more than 17, is both "Defendant A" and "Co-Defendant A of the first instance court."

Part 15 of the judgment of the court of first instance (attached Form 2) of not more than 21 of the judgment of the court of first instance (attached Form 2) shall be the list of the persons who have leaked the C Card in attached Form 3.

On the 16th judgment of the first instance court, the "Evidences 1 through 90 of the first instance judgment" in the 20th judgment is understood as "Evidences 1 through 93 of the first instance judgment."

The first instance court's 42 pages 10 to 44 pages 18 are as follows.

1. Promotion of use of information and communications networks and protection of information, whether the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection applies.