logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 안동지원 2016.05.27 2016고단142
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(운전자폭행등)등
Text

1. The sentence against the accused shall be four million won;

2. The defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 30, 2016, the Defendant: (a) on January 30, 2016, 196, she was a victim C (54 years old) who was a taxi engineer in the vicinity of the Gu Ri basin located in the 34 roads, and became a Samsung Station located in Samsung C (54 years old), Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, which was located in Samsung Cro 538.

1. From around 03:30 on the same day, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (such as a driver’s assault, etc.), at Samsung Station located in Samsung Station in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the victim C arrived at Samsung Station, the purpose of which is to set a taxi and locked, and the victim shouldered the Defendant, and the victim, “I am the same bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch.” The victim’s face was set off twice.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the driver of a vehicle in operation.

2. At around 03:55 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the performance of official duties, prior to the F police box located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant: (b) 112 reported and received a 112 report from G police officers of the Gangnam Police Station F police box; and (c) sought a request for returning home after calculating taxi expenses from G to the police officers other than G, who were in receipt of a request for a request for a return home; (b) taken video images on a mobile phone in order to provide evidence with the Defendant’s desire, and (c) obstructed the cell phone by cutting off the cell phone to the floor and cutting off the cell phone to the floor; and (d) assaulted the other police officers from walking one time to walk the left part of the G, who seeed to the mobile phone.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reporting duties by police officers G 112.

3. The Defendant damaged a mobile phone at the time and at the place specified in the above paragraph (2) above, by cutting the victim G’s hand to photograph dynamic images on a mobile phone as set forth in paragraph (2) above, and then damaging the cell phone and destroying the cell phone at the market price owned by the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to G and C;

1. C’s statement;

1. A damaged photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (the details produced by a police officer dispatched to the scene);

1. Criminal facts;

arrow