The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (one year and two months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are no circumstances such as the defendant's confession of all the facts of the crime of this case and the statement that the defendant is divided into depth of the facts of this case, the defendant's person who is also aware of his active interest and guidance to the defendant, and the defendant expressed his personal information to the defendant at the investigation stage. However, prior to each of the crimes of this case, the defendant has already been sentenced to imprisonment on several occasions due to the violation of the Psychotropic Drugs Control Act, the violation of the Psychotropic Drugs Control Act, the violation of the Narcotic Drugs Control Act, and the violation of the Psychotropic Drugs Control Act, etc., and in particular, on December 28, 2009, the defendant was sentenced one year of imprisonment with prison labor for the violation of the Narcotic Control Act, and the defendant again commits the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime without being able to have been released from the prison on November 3, 2010 and without being able to do so, the defendant's argument that the defendant committed the crime of this case again during the period of the crime of this case.

I would like to say.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.