1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Basic facts

A. On May 27, 1981, Defendant C completed registration of preservation of ownership in accordance with the former Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Ownership of Real Estate (Act No. 3094 of Dec. 31, 197, invalidation, etc.) with respect to the area of 28,066 square meters of G forest in Masan-si, Changwon-si (hereinafter “instant forest”).

B. On August 17, 2015, Defendant D completed the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of donation (hereinafter “registration under Defendant D”) on August 13, 2015 with respect to the instant forest land, and on July 26, 2016, Defendant E and F completed the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of donation (hereinafter “registration under Defendant E and F name”). On July 26, 2016, Defendant D completed the registration of ownership transfer on the basis of donation on July 26, 2016 with respect to the respective share of 3,765/28,06 of the instant forest land in the name of Defendant E and F.

[Reasons for Recognition] Uncontentious Facts, Entry of Evidence A No. 1 and the purport of whole pleadings

2. Summary of the plaintiffs' assertion

A. On July 19, 2016, Defendant C agreed to transfer 1/3 shares of the instant forest to the Plaintiffs, and thus, Defendant C is obligated to implement the procedure for ownership transfer registration under the said agreement. 2) Even if the agreement is not followed by the agreement under Article 4 (1) of the Act on the Registration of Real Estate under Actual Titleholder’s Name (hereinafter “Real Estate Name Act”), Defendant C purchased the instant forest from H, and Defendant C donated 1/3 shares to the Plaintiffs and Defendant C, respectively. The Plaintiffs trusted 1/3 shares of the instant forest to Defendant C. Since the said title trust agreement was terminated, Defendant C is obligated to implement the procedure for ownership transfer registration with respect to shares of 1/3 shares of the instant forest among the instant forest. Thus, even if the said agreement is invalid pursuant to Article 4 (1) of the said Act, if the title trust agreement is bilaterally held on the date of title trust, the Plaintiffs were subject to ownership transfer registration with respect to the instant forest under the name of Defendant C/C under the name of the said owner.