Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, while operating “E” on December 12, 2013, employed the Victim F (F, female, 39 years of age) as an accounting employee and worked together with the Defendant.

1. The Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Indecent Act on the Abuse of Occupational Authority, etc.) committed an indecent act by force against a victim under the protection and supervision of the Defendant due to his/her duties, employment or other relationship in the E office located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangnam-gu, Seoul on January 16, 2014, by taking the loss of the victim F from the E office, and by taking the loss of the victim F from the victim F from the time of the same year.

3. up to June, as in the list of crimes, indecent act was committed by force against the victim under the protection and supervision of the defendant due to business, employment, or other relationship over 14 times in total.

2. On March 6, 2014, around 18:00 on March 6, 2014, the Defendant is not more than the victim and the Defendant are not more than the victim because the victim continues to comply with the foregoing at E office located in H of Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul Metropolitan Government.

Around two weeks of harm was inflicted on the victim by cutting down the left arms of the victim who wanting to get the above office with him/her and pushing out his/her shoulder, and destroying the victim over his/her wave, resulting in an injury to the victim, such as the left-hand strawing on the left-hand side, the gambling room, and the diversificational coordinate that require treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. The statement of witness F in the second protocol of the trial;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. The prosecutor's statement concerning the F;

1. A statement prepared by the F;

1. The contents of the Kakao Stockholm conversation (Evidence No. 7);

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel stated in the list of crimes in the attached list, since they were between the victim F and the defendant, each act does not go against the victim's will, and it does not go against the victim's sexual humiliation, nor does it infringe on the victim's sexual freedom, nor did it use deceptive means or force, and there was no injury to the victim F.

1.2.2