logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.09.12 2016가단34424
공사비(임금)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 34,768,563 as well as 5% per annum from February 15, 2016 to October 6, 2016 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company established for the purpose of indoor construction business, etc., and the Defendant is a company established for the purpose of construction business.

B. From October 21, 2015 to January 9, 2016, the Plaintiff, at the request of the Defendant, input the human body, carried out the interior decoration of the new kindergarten construction works in the old and American City C (hereinafter “instant construction”) and completed the construction.

C. On January 10, 2016, the Plaintiff and the Defendant did not set the initial specific construction cost. On January 10, 2016, 110,200 won per capita per day, 551.01 of the total number of construction works, and the total construction cost shall be 10,202,200 won, subtracting the amount of KRW 76,363,637 from the total construction cost, 33,838,563, and 2,36,28,563 in total from the Plaintiff’s personal food substitute payment amount of KRW 2,450,00,00 to the Defendant, and on October 25, 2016, the Defendant’s On-site Director requested the Defendant to submit to the Defendant a new 36,68,563 bill of confirmation from October 21, 2015 to January 9, 2016, the Plaintiff’s 200,360,205,20.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 8, 10, 11 (including additional numbers), Eul evidence 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff had a claim, such as wages, upon selective admission of human rights to the instant construction work, which is directly managed by the Defendant, or upon receiving a subcontract from the Defendant for the instant construction work, the Plaintiff had a claim for the construction cost under the subcontract construction contract.

(b).

arrow