1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The court's explanation concerning this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, it is citing this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Following the judgment of the court of first instance, “(3) of the third 4th son Co., Ltd.” stated in the evidence No. 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the Defendant added “B” to “B, while filing a complaint against the Plaintiff for embezzlement, and on the ground that G was the captain of the “Defendant’s site or the agent for the payment of construction expenses, and voluntarily stated the contents contrary to the assertion in this case,” the Defendant added “B-3 through 7, 17, and 19.” The Defendant added “B-3 through 19” to “Evidence No. 4 through 7, 17, and 19” under the third 8th 8th son of the judgment of the court of first 1. The Defendant affixed a seal imprint on “D Co., Ltd.’s corporate seal impression, which is not an individual seal impression,” and the Plaintiff did not have a representative director at the time, and thus, according to the overall arguments and arguments, the Defendant also appears to have known that the contract of this case was null and void.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.