logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.10.15 2019나56319
장비임대료
Text

The judgment of the first instance court is modified as follows. A.

The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 4,006,534 as well as to the plaintiff on July 18, 2018.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff and the defendant's grounds of appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified even if the evidence additionally submitted to this court

Therefore, the reasoning of this court is that the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition or dismissal of a part as follows.

2. The addition or dismissal of the part in the judgment of the court of first instance, which is the second 12 pages of the second 12 written statement alone, shall be added to the following “the Plaintiff and the Defendant”.

After the third 6th 6th c of the first instance judgment, “(D equipment leased by the Plaintiff to the Defendant as above)” is added, and the third 7th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth “ difficult to see” is added.

Then, the fourth 1st 1st son of the judgment of the court of first instance added “(the Plaintiff asserted that this part-off is unjustifiable as it was not notified of the transfer of the above assignment, but in light of the e-mail content between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, the Plaintiff was aware that the above purchase price claim was transferred to the Defendant, and thereafter, even though the tax invoice was issued for the above KRW 55 million in the name of the Defendant, the Plaintiff was partly repaid to the Defendant without raising any objection thereto).”

The fourth second sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance added “the fact that there was 2,500,000 won of the outstanding amount (the plaintiff asserted that there is no 2,500,000 won of the outstanding amount, but no data or circumstances that can be seen different from the above recognition exists).”

The 4,816,534 of the principal and interest claim amounting to KRW 4,816,534 of the principal and interest claim amounting to KRW 4,81 of the first instance judgment (interest interest amounting to KRW 4,722,600 of the principal and interest claim amounting to KRW 93,934 of the interest interest amounting to KRW 93,934 of the principal and interest claim amounting to 6% per annum as prescribed by the Commercial Act is all the original and the defendant's merchants), "4,00,878 won per 12 of the same act and 13 of the same act."

arrow