logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2013.07.10 2013고정439
상습사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 4, 2010, the defendant was issued a summary order of a fine of three million won at the Changwon District Court to be a fraud, and there is a habitual habiting wall with the same criminal records seven times.

1. On April 5, 2012, around 00:25, the Defendant was provided with alcohol, alcohol, and entertainment services from the victim D by doing so as to have paid the drinking value, such as “Csing shop” at “Csing shop” in Kimhae-si B, “I am in her ability, with the payment of money, at 200,000 won.”

However, there was no intention or ability to pay the drinking value.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, obtained a total of KRW 165,00,00, including the amount of KRW 20 disease of beer (80,000) and KRW 40,00,000 from the victim, and the amount of service charges (45,00,000) of entertainment receptioners (40,000).

2. On April 14, 2012, around 21:00, the Defendant was provided with alcohol and alcohol from the Victim G as if he were to pay the drinking value by displaying his own fingerprints at “F main points” located in Kimhae-si, Kimhae-si.

However, as an empty wall, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the drinking value.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received from the victim the amount of KRW 120,00,00, which is 120,000,000, which is 3 diseases of beer and 1 beerags of beer and beer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning G and D;

1. A written complaint and a written statement;

1. Receipts:

1. A report on investigation;

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the records of each crime, the frequency of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the repeated crimes of the same kind in the judgment;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 351 and 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

2. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

3. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow