1. The defendant shall order each point of the attached Form 1, 2, 3, 8, and 1 among the real estate listed in the attached list to the plaintiff.

1. On June 21, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant on June 21, 2013, stipulating that the leased deposit amount of KRW 4,00,00, monthly rent of KRW 350,00 (payment on June 25, 201), and KRW 36,00 for the lease of KRW 1,2,3,8, and 1 each of the items indicated in the separate sheet among the real estate listed in the separate sheet; the Defendant returned the above 8 commercial building to the Plaintiff and currently occupied and used the house in this case; the Plaintiff’s declaration of intention to terminate the contract; and the Defendant could not be recognized as having reached the conclusion of each of the parties’ arguments, taking into account the following facts:

According to the above facts, it is recognized that the above lease contract was explicitly renewed between the original defendant and the original defendant, and it was legally terminated on or around January 20, 2015, when the plaintiff's declaration of intention to terminate the contract was delivered on or after the termination of the contract. Thus, the defendant is obligated to deliver the house of this case to the plaintiff with the restoration of the original state due to the termination of the contract and pay the money calculated by the ratio of KRW 350,000 per month from December 26, 2013 to the delivery date of the house of this case due to the return of unjust enrichment equivalent to the overdue rent and the rent.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.