The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On June 17, 2019, around 00:30 on June 17, 2019, the Defendant: (a) sought that “the victim had a credit rating in the year 2012 because the victim had a credit rating in the “D main store” operated by the victim C (hereinafter “D main store”); (b) assaulted the victim, who had shown a credit rating on the part of his/her right shoulder by hand, was tightly pushed down the victim’s right shoulder; and (c) was tightly pushed down the part of this part with a cellular phone cited by the Man-do hand at one time.

B. The Defendant is insulting.

At the time, place, etc. mentioned in paragraph (1) and where there are other people, such as E, etc. for the same reason, the victim publicly insultingd the victim by openly referring the victim as “Is bitch bitch bitch, bitch bitch bitch bitch,

2. Provisions of applicable provisions to the facts charged in judgment: Article 260 (1) and Article 311 of the Criminal Act: Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act (in the case of violence) and Article 311 (in the case of offense subject to victim's complaint): Article 312 (1) (in the case of insult) of the Criminal Act (in the case of offense subject to complaint), the victim shall submit to the accused a written application for withdrawal of a complaint and a written application for non-compliance with punishment on July 31, 2020. In the case of dismissal of prosecution, Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act (in the case of which a complaint shall be filed) (in the case of which a complaint shall be filed), Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act (in the case of which an expression of intent not to prosecute a case which cannot be prosecuted