(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2017.01.11 2015가단21666

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2017.01.11 2015가단21666

손해배상(자)

Text

1. The Korean Federation of Freight Trucking Services (hereinafter “Korea”) shall be the Plaintiff’s KRW 9,086,90 and its amount from May 16, 2013.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Status 1) The Plaintiff is a Switzerlandr (hereinafter “victim”)

2) As the actual owner of the said vehicle, the said vehicle is a person who operates the said vehicle by entering the consignment management contract with the said company. (2) The Defendant trucking Transport Association (hereinafter “Defendant Federation”) is a mutual aid business entity that entered into a mutual aid agreement with Nonparty C with respect to the D Cargo Vehicles owned by Nonparty C (hereinafter “AF”).

3) Defendant Shipping Industry Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Shipping Industry”).

(B) A repair company is a company that repairs the damaged vehicle. Around 04:00 on May 16, 2013, Nonparty C, who caused the instant accident, driven by a sea-going vehicle and opened the 4-distance road on the west-dong side of the Chungcheongnam-gun of the Chungcheongnam-gun of the Chungcheongnam-gun, the front part of the damaged vehicle that passed four km from the right side of the damaged vehicle in the direction to the left side in accordance with new subparagraph and due to the negligence that continued without viewing the red signal due to the string, while driving the road on the west-dong side of the Chungcheong-gun, the front part of the damaged vehicle, which passed the 4-day distance from the right side of the damaged vehicle, was suffering from the Plaintiff’s injury on the chilled salt and tension for about three weeks (hereinafter “instant accident”).

c. 1) The damaged vehicle immediately after the instant accident was entered into the E-Motor Vehicle Industrial Complex located in the Hahbuk-gun.

2) The Defendant Federation suggested that the Plaintiff be able to take full charge of the damaged vehicle and pay damages therefrom on the ground that the estimate of the repair cost for the damaged vehicle exceeds KRW 50 million at the time of the accident of the damaged vehicle. 3) The Plaintiff asserted that the repair of the damaged vehicle can be repaired, and the Plaintiff was able to leave the damaged vehicle to the specialized repair business entity, and around July 2013, Defendant Shipping Industry entered the damaged vehicle into the Defendant Shipping Industry.

4 After the damaged vehicle entered into the Defendant Shipping Industry, the estimation of the repair cost for the damaged vehicle is about 67,737.

유사 판례

-청주지방법원 2016.07.07 2015고단534 (2)

-대구지방법원 2018.10.25 2016가단133185

-인천지방법원 2016.05.24 2015가단241999

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.03.25 2014가단5168015

-광주지방법원 2018.10.19 2015가합60155