1. On June 6, 2015, around 15:30, while operating a B-cab owned by an international industry limited partnership company, the Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong-gu.

1. Basic facts

A. At around 15:30 on June 6, 2015, Nonparty E driven a B-cab for business use (hereinafter referred to as “fluoring vehicle”) and was proceeding in front of Nonparty C’s vehicle while driving in the two-lanes of the two-lane road near the Busan Bupyeong-gu, Busan, the part of the back part of the damaged vehicle was shocked with the front part of the damaged vehicle.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

The plaintiff is a mutual aid business operator who has entered into a mutual aid agreement with an international industry limited partnership company, which is the owner of a marine vehicle, and the defendant is the owner of a damaged vehicle.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, entry of Gap Nos. 2 and 4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1) The plaintiff's assertion 1) The accident of this case is an accident where the damaged vehicle conflicts slightly with the damaged vehicle, and there was no damage to the damaged vehicle, and only the paint itself occurred. However, the plaintiff asserts that the latter part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part of the cost of exchange and the estimated rent of 1,751,750 won during the entry period for the latter part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part

B. Determination 1 on the part of the repair and the Defendant claimed insurance money equivalent to the cost for the replacement of the damaged vehicle due to the instant accident to the Plaintiff.

The whole purpose of the pleadings shall be taken into consideration in the descriptions of Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 3-1 to 3, Gap evidence 4 and 5.