A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 12, 2013, the Defendant: (a) 23:00 on March 12, 2013, 2013, the Defendant: (b) took place as if he had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had been; and (c) had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had hadd, then he cut off one copy of the victim E’s driver’s license owned by the victim E; (b) 1 copy of the student bank check; (c) 200,000 won of the market price, including a credit card card owned by the victim E, the father of the victim E.

2. On March 12, 2013, the Defendant violated the Fraud and the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act: (a) made a payment for alcohol and alcohol to the victim H working as an employee in the Gnonoo-gu Gnono-gu, Ansan-si; (b) made a payment for the total amount of KRW 150,000 by means of digital signature on the card approval slip; and (c) made a payment on the card approval slip with the F’s credit card bank, which was stolen, as provided in paragraph (1).

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, exempted the victim from paying the sum of KRW 150,00,000, which is the same as the amount of property profit, and used stolen credit cards.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A H statement;

1. Related photographs of each case;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 70 (1) 3 of the Specialized Credit Finance Business Act (the use of stolen credit cards, the occupation of use of stolen credit cards, and the choice of imprisonment);

1. From among concurrent crimes, the crime committed without being aware of the fact that the defendant had been subject to juvenile protective disposition despite the fact that he/she committed the same kind of crime, and the damage has not been recovered, in light of the first sentence of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Aggravated Punishment Act and the reason for sentencing are similar to the defendant;