logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2015. 12. 15. 선고 2015다240638 판결
채무의 변제가 부족한 상태에서 재산을 특정 채권자에게 대물변제나 담보조로 제공하였다면 사해행위에 해당함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul Northern District Court 2015Na30709 ( October 18, 2015)

Title

If a property is provided to a certain creditor as payment in kind or as security when the debt is insufficient, it constitutes a fraudulent act.

Summary

(1) In the event that the obligor’s properties are insufficient to fully repay the obligor’s obligations, if the obligor’s properties are provided to a certain obligee as payment in kind or as a collateral, it would immediately constitute a fraudulent act in relation to other obligees unless there are special circumstances

Related statutes

Article 30 of the National Tax Collection Act, Article 406 of the Civil Act

Cases

2015Da240638 Revocation of Fraudulent Act

Plaintiff-Appellant

Korea

Defendant-Appellee

○ Kim

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul Northern District Court Decision 2015Na30709 Decided September 18, 2015

Imposition of Judgment

December 15, 2015

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

As the petition of appeal does not contain any statement in the grounds of appeal and did not submit the grounds of appeal within the statutory period, Article 429 of the Civil Procedure Act and Article 5 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Procedure of Appeal is decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating

arrow