The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. Around December 8, 2009, the Defendant, at his own house of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 402, forged the application form for the registration of the KB card member and the receipt form column by stating “D” in the name column, “E” in the resident number column, and then delivered it to the KB card delivery officer for the purpose of exercising, notwithstanding the fact that the Defendant obtained the victim D’s consent at his own house of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 402.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the defendant forged the application form for the membership of the KB card and one receipt certificate on the rights and duties of the victim, and exercised one forged application form for membership of the KB card and one receipt certificate.

2. In a judgment, the burden of proof for the criminal facts prosecuted in a criminal trial is to be borne by the public prosecutor, and the conviction of guilt is to be based on evidence with probative value sufficient to cause a judge to have the truth of the facts charged to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt, and if there is no such evidence, it is doubtful that the defendant is guilty.

Even if there is no choice but to judge the interests of the defendant.

(2) In light of the following circumstances revealed by the record of the instant case, it is difficult to believe that D’s statement is without reasonable doubt, and the remainder of the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to deem that the facts charged of the instant case were proven without reasonable doubt, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

The Defendant, who is a bad credit holder at the time of the instant case, has already been in the name of D mobile phone with D’s consent, and the deposit account of our bank.