logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2015.12.09 2015고단990
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 22, 2015, the Defendant was demanded to collect the front door password, which he had been aware that he had been living together with a female-friendly job offers victim B, from the victim who had been living together with a house without the victim, on the ground that he had been living together with the front door C, the house of the victim B, which is the house of the victim B, and that he would request the victim to leave.

However, the defendant does not respond to it, and until a police officer dispatched by the report of the victim at around 08:00 on the same day arrives, he/she takes a bath at his/her house until he/she arrives, and therefore, he/she leaves the victim's house without justifiable grounds.

The Gu refused to comply with the Gu.

2. Around 08:00 on June 22, 2015, the Defendant destroyed the property damage by breaking the shock risk, the victim’s market price of which is the victim’s possession, due to a large amount of loss, in a knife, in a knife, with a knife, and with a knife.

3. On June 22, 2015, around 08:35, the Defendant, at the house of the above B, was suffering disturbance as above, and the background E belonging to the D District District of the old U.S. police station, dispatched upon receipt of a report, can be punished for the crime of non-compliance with the eviction. Thus, E continues to dispute with B by stating that “I do not have to be within the fine. I do not go to go to go to go to the workplace,” and, in order for the Defendant to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender in the crime of non-compliance with the escape, E’s broths were spathd over 2 to 3 times with the defect left hand, and assaulted the Defendant’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s bat, with a bad hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning police officers' 112 reported duties and suppression of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to B, E, and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports [including two photographs of damaged articles (including photographs of damaged articles attached thereto)] and photographs thereof;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 319(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act of the same Act concerning criminal facts, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and Article 319(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act for each criminal law.

arrow