A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 1, 2019, from around 01:00 to around 02:15 of the same day, the Defendant, in response to the eviction-gu in Ulsan-gu, a residence of the victim C (the age of 26) located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, (the age of 26) and the mudio D, where the victim drinks with the victim while drinking together with the victim at the mudio in the mudio of the previous mudio, and the victim asserts the face of the victim before the above mudio, and entered the above mudio as the victim followed, followed the victim, and instead, the Defendant neglected the demand of the victim to leave from the police officer belonging to the Ulsan-nam Police Station E zone of the Ulsan-gu, Busan-do Police Station by the victim after the 112 report, and failed to leave the mudio by hing the said police officer.

Accordingly, the defendant leaves from the victim's residence.

The Gu received the Gu but did not comply with it.

2. On April 1, 2019, at around 02:16, the Defendant: (a) arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender committing the crime of non-compliance with the eviction under the foregoing paragraph (1) and let the patrol vehicle board the patrol vehicle along with the police officers belonging to the Ulsannam Police Station E district unit of the Ulsannam Police Station E district, the place of transfer; (b) “I will not go to the house? I will go to go to the house? I will not go to the house? I will go to go to the house? I will go to go to the back of the patrol vehicle moving to the E district of the Ulsan Namnam Police Station E district, the place of transfer; and (c) as I would go to drinking F (the age 28) of the above patrol vehicle belonging to the Defendant, I would go to the Defendant, and I would like to go to go to the police station at the seat of the victim.” (AC is arrested as a flagrant offender, and I would have to go to the criminal police station at the seat of the victim.”

이로써 피고인은 피해자인 위 F에게 약 2주간의 치료가 필요한 빰, 귀의 타박상을 가함과 동시에 경찰관인 위 F의 현행범인체포 및 인치에 관한 정당한 직무집행을 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1.F.