logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.04.01 2015고단88
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From January 9, 2015 to 21:35 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant: (a) interfered with the business by force, such as: (b) whether it has been verified that he would normally start to start to open to the subway station; (c) why why she would have known 14,90 won on the card; and (d) why she would have known 14,90 won; and (d) why she would have known her customers who want to purchase the subway ticket with the hand floor of 2-3 times in order to create a fear of fear to the customers who want to purchase the subway ticket, in the subway station located in Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon.

2. On the ground that the victim G, the police officer of the F District, and the victim H, the police officer of the F District, recommended the victim H, who was in the position of the F District, to be “satisfing a son,” after having received a report that “the satisfing a satch” in the same date, time and place, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victims by publicly insulting the victim on the ground that the victim H, the police officer of the F District, “the satisfing a satch because the satisf was not abnormal

3. In order for the Defendant to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender at the same time, place, and the F District Head H to take custody of the Defendant into the F District, the Defendant committed an assault, such as the Defendant’s Habbuck Ha on the back of the 112 patrols, to avoid getting away from the defective vehicle in the latter seat of the 112 patrols.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties concerning the arrest of police officers.

4. On January 9, 2015, the Defendant: (a) was arrested in flagrant offenders due to interference with duties and insults from G G of the F Zone on the part of the U.S. on a night-time basis; (b) during the 112 patrol line, and (c) went to the F Zone on the back seat of the J 112 patrol line; and (d) caused damage to the goods for public use by destroying the flick door of the back seat of the patrol line of KRW 20,000, the market price of the goods for public use, such as a flick, flick, etc.

Summary of Evidence

【Interference with Business】

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1.E and I, respectively.

arrow