All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Although Defendant E did not inflict an injury upon Defendant E, it is unreasonable for Defendant E to file a complaint with Defendant while “the Defendant suffered an injury upon Defendant at his own time,” and perjury in the court. Thus, Defendant’s accusation with Defendant E without accusation and perjury is consistent with objective facts, and does not constitute an unaffortuous accusation (defford 4 months of imprisonment) and the lower court’s punishment against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

(F) 2.2

The lower court’s sentence against the Defendant by the Prosecutor is too unjustifiable.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court regarding the Defendant’s assertion of misunderstanding of facts, the lower court accused the Defendant on December 24, 201: (a) stated in the investigative agency that “the Defendant assaulted E at the conference on December 24, 2011; (b) stated on January 29, 2012 that “the Defendant was able to have been able to have been tried to commit rape with his/her attorney off his/her clothes,” and that “the Defendant was able to have been able to have been able to have his/her face informed of 20 days after he/she was able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have his/her face 20 days after having been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have able to have her face 3 me and e 1.”

“.......”