1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as follows, except for the addition of the following judgments as to the assertion that the defendant emphasizes in the trial of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

2. On November 28, 2013, the Defendant asserts that the Plaintiff is not a legitimate owner of the instant share in the site. However, the said Supreme Court’s decision is the purport that, in a case where the ownership of an aggregate building in the site was newly constructed before the establishment of the right to use the site was established and the registration of ownership was completed due to the exercise of another right to use the site, and where the purchaser sells the ownership of an aggregate building in the site before the establishment of the right to use the site was completed due to the exercise of another right to use the site, even though the right to use the site was established before the establishment of the right to use the site, the right to use the site was established by the sale of another right to use the site through an auction to execute another right to use the site, and that the buyer of the exclusive ownership acquired the right to use the site in the first place prior to the establishment of the right to use the site in the instant case through the voluntary auction procedure.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. The plaintiff's primary claim should be accepted as reasonable.