beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with labor for one year, and for one year and eight months, and for Defendant C, Defendant D, and Defendant E, respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
In order to pay the price to the person who uses the SNS’s conversation from the SNS’s Megical Megical Megical Megical Megical Megical Megical Megical Megical Megical Megical Megical Megical Megical Megical Megical Megical Megical Megical Megical Meg
After making the payment of the money into China, the defendant A had the above-mentioned access medium delivered through the "wealth," and ordered the defendant A to withdraw the money by using the above access medium. The defendant A, according to the direction, had the defendant B and J withdrawn the money by receiving the above access medium, and had the withdrawal of the money by using the above access medium, and had the remaining amount excluding 10% of the money withdrawn from the money as allowances, and conspired to re-transfer the money to the account designated by the above person without the name.
1. On August 5, 2016, Defendant A and Defendant B made a false statement to the victim K by phoneing the victim K at an insular area not exceeding the Philippines around 10:00 on August 5, 2016, and falsely called “to make a substitute loan at a low interest.”
However, the name-free person is not an employee of modern capital and has no intention or ability to make a loan.
Nevertheless, on August 8, 2016, by deceiving the victim, and making the victim transfer KRW 300,000 to the bank account (M) with L's name around 14:45 on August 8, 2016, and around 12:30 on August 9, 2016, KRW 5.8 million, including KRW 2.8 million, to the bank account (O) with N's name, from August 12:30, 2016, to the bank account with N's name, and then, to the N transfer KRW 2.8 million, deposited into the bank under the name of N to the bank (P).
Since then, Defendant A was ordered to withdraw from the above person’s name in the name, and around 13:00 on August 8, 2016, Defendant A moved QMW car operated by Defendant B to the same 116 agricultural products located in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwangjin-gu, and Defendant B waiting in the vehicle, and Defendant A entered the bank and entered the bank, and Defendant A entered the bank, as described in Article 2(a).