logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2018.05.16 2018고단142
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall borrow or lend any access medium or distribute the storage, transmission, or distribution while demanding and promising to receive compensation in using and managing the access medium.

Nevertheless, on June 2017, the Defendant called from a person who was infinite to get loans from his name, and provided mobile phone No. 201 of the Kacheon City C Building with the personal account number, password, and security card number in the name of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the Defendant promised to pay for the price and lent the approaching media.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. The issue of this case’s receipt and transaction specification table is whether or not the Defendant informed of the account number, password, security card number, etc. was the means to obtain the loan, or whether or not other persons allow the Defendant to arbitrarily conduct electronic financial transactions using the access medium in return for the loan.

The details stated by this Act and by investigative agencies concerning the circumstances of the instant case are as follows:

On June 9, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was urged to receive a high interest rate loan as a low interest loan because he/she was entitled to receive a consultation because he/she was a phone call from a person in an unsatisfyed name in his/her name; (b) on November 13, 2017, the Defendant stated to the effect that he/she was “the name and telephone number of the lending company is old” at the time of the police investigation; (c) on February 9, 2018, the Defendant was called as a “Modern Capital Staff” at the time of the prosecutor’s investigation; and (d) only confirmed that there was a company of Hyundai Capital in the Internet, and (d) made a statement to the effect that he/she did not confirm who was a person in charge of the said loan from three lending companies at the time of the confirmation of the judgment of the Republic of Korea.

arrow