beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 1,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.
The Defendants respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A’s summary in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City E around November 20, 2013, around 03:19
With regard to the fact that the victim B(the age of 47) reported 112 with the content that the victim B(the age of 47) is employed in a singing room on the road, the victim was diversized and diversed with bather bather bather, so that the victim's bat around 2 weeks of medical treatment.
2. Defendant B, at the above time and place, knee and knee knee knee kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne knee kne kne kned from the victim A (the age of 48).
Summary of Evidence
1. Protocol concerning the suspect interrogation of each of the Defendants
1. Each injury diagnosis letter;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes as a result of verification in this Act (CCTV);
1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the selection of fines;
1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;
1. As to the Defendants’ assertion of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, Defendant A asserts that, in his first instance, he did not flab Defendant B’s ebbbbbage, but Defendant B’s ebbbbbbbage first flaps, and Defendant A’s ebbbbbbbbbbbbage, with intent not to do so in excess of his breath, and it merely exceeded Defendant B’s ebbbbbbbage, and thus, it constitutes self-defense.
On the other hand, Defendant B asserts that he unilaterally committed an act of violence by unilaterally leading Defendant A to the breath by unilaterally leading Defendant A, and that he did not commit a harmful act.
In full view of the aforementioned evidence, in particular, the above verification results, etc., the defendants met the other party in the vicinity of the time of the instant case, so that they could not get the other party in the form of a breath line, and could not get the other party in the form of a breath line, and had the breath of the breath line with each other. The defendants met the breath of the breath line with each other and exceeded the ground floor.