logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.09.22 2016고단3941
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 6, 2016, at around 23:20, the Defendant destroyed the first floor door, which is the Defendant’s residence located in Sudio in Sudio Co., Ltd., and thus, on the ground that the door door was set off to the victim E, who is the owner of the building, but the door was not opened properly, the Defendant broken the door door locking system of KRW 200,000 at the market price of the next victim’s possession twice, which was continuously set up on the floor, and was set up inside the door while continuously putting the fire at the door door, and broken down the glass liquid, which was the victim’s market price known.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property.

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 1 and at the site upon the request of E, who is the owner of the above building, has expressed a bath to the victim F (28 Dose) of the above E, and “the width is a kys of the manager.”

“Fathered with a sound and hand, assaulted, such as fating and smuggling.”

3. Interference with the performance of official duties, and the Defendant’s injury, at the date, time, place, and at the place specified in paragraph 1, shall be in line with each other.

“A police officer, who was reported on 112 and was dispatched to the site, committed an assault by the victim H(30 years old), who was a patrol officer at the site, to witness the criminal facts as referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article, to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender in the crime of assault, to take the victim’s face with his hand, and to have the victim face with his/her face with his/her hand, and to have him/her face with the patrol vehicle located there.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the police officer's 112 report processing and legitimate execution of duties concerning arrest of flagrant offenders, and at the same time, the Defendant placed multiple scambling scams that require approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to H and E;

1. A statement prepared by the F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 257 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts.

arrow