logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.01.17 2017고정1022
자동차관리법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 8, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a special assault in the Suwon Friwon, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 14, 2017.

No person other than an owner of a motor vehicle or a person entrusted with matters concerning the operation of a motor vehicle by a motor vehicle owner shall operate the motor vehicle.

On April 7, 2017, the Defendant: (a) purchased in cash KRW 3 million from a house near Suwon-si, Suwon-si, which was located in Suwon-si, B, and became aware of the fact that he was not a legitimate owner of a motor vehicle. (b) The Defendant was aware of the fact that he was not a legitimate owner of a motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, from April 7, 2017 to April 12, 2017, operated the said B car even though he was not the user of the vehicle from around April 7, 2017.

On June 8, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a special assault in the Suwon Friwon, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 14, 2017.

The defendant, in collusion with D on September 29, 2016, sent it to the defendant by affixing a photograph of an Awdi A6 vehicle parked on the first floor, Awdi A6 vehicle that is parked on an adjacent pel, and the defendant shows it to the victim G and H, and the defendant has an Af vehicle of an Af vehicle of an amount equivalent to KRW 20 million, which is sold to KRW 16 million.

8 million won is now at present and the next notice calls for payment of the remainder of 8 million won if the vehicle had a vehicle.

However, in fact, the defendant and D did not have an A6 vehicle that they stated to the victims, and shown the victims who want to inquire into the vehicle at their own discretion, and therefore there was no intention or ability to deliver the vehicle as agreed, even if they received the payment from the victims.

The defendant, in collusion with D, deceiving the victims and deceiving them.

arrow