beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 64,960,407 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from June 28, 2002 to September 24, 2015, and the following.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. At around 19:00 on June 27, 2002, the Plaintiff (C) suffered an injury to both sides of the upper half of the upper half of the upper half of the upper half of the upper half of the upper half of the upper half of the upper half of the upper half of the upper half of the upper half of the upper half of the upper half of the year.
B. On June 28, 2002, the Plaintiff entered B University Hospital operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) and undergone a surgery from static surgery and doctor D. On the right-side frame, the Plaintiff performed non-grade Domination (non-aryary Domination,man refluent Domination) and K-K-G course insertion, and open static Domination for the right-side frame (on the right-side frame, refluent Domination), and K-K-G course insertion insertion.
(hereinafter “instant surgery”). C.
The Plaintiff’s Domination of Domination and K-K-K-K-K-K-line inserting of the upper right frame was performed without any group by inserting the 1/3 line near the upper right frame and inserting the K-K-K-K-line into the upper right frame through the tent. However, in the case of the upper right frame, the right frame was intended to mination by inserting the K-K-K-G line several times into the upper right frame through the same tent, but it was failed, after cutting the skin at 1/3 point in the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part, by exposing the upper part, and then exposing the upper part, the annual organization of the upper part of the upper part was shocked.
In the nursing record book of the Defendant Hospital, the Plaintiff stated “Rtsensens, Mobrches” as to the Plaintiff’s status immediately after the instant operation, and also stated “Rm Promotion kep,” as to the status on June 29, 2002.
On June 29, 2002, the completion records of the Defendant Hospital stated that “Thumburb excis” is also stated as the Plaintiff’s status.
E. However, as a result of the neutism test conducted on July 9, 2002, the Plaintiff’s right-side neutronology is the neutism of the neutism.