1. The defendant on December 2, 1998 as to each real estate listed in the separate sheet to the plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. It is stated that the land research division prepared by the Japanese governor-general under the Joseon Land Survey Order, which was enforced during the Japanese occupation period, was the land research division of the Japanese governor-general for the Japanese governor-general for the Japanese governor-general for the Japanese governor-general for the Japanese governor-general for the Japanese governor-general for the Japanese governor-general for the Japanese governor-general for the Japanese governor-general for the Japanese governor-general for the Japanese governor-general for the Japanese governor-general for the Japanese governor-general for the Japanese governor-general for the Japanese governor-general for the Japanese governor-general for the Japanese governor-general for the Japanese governor-general for the Japanese governor-general for the Japanese governor-general for the Japanese governor-general for the Japanese governor-general for the Japanese governor

B. The old land cadastre is registered as the owner of J with the address in the Nari-gun with respect to the land of this case in the former land cadastre.

C. The instant assessment land became each land indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant land”) through the conversion of the area, change of administrative jurisdiction, etc., and the registration of ownership preservation was completed by K with respect to the instant land, and the Plaintiff’s request for cancellation of the said registration against K (Ycheon District Court Youngcheon Branch Branch 95No417) was accepted, and the said registration was revoked.

As to the instant land, the Defendant completed the registration of preservation of ownership (hereinafter “registration of preservation of this case”) by the receipt No. 9421, Dec. 2, 1998, as to the land of this case by the Youngcheon District Court Youngcheon District Court’s Young Branch Branch Branch

E. On the other hand, the plaintiff's early L had resided in the Young-gun M, and died, and the plaintiff inherited the N's property jointly.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 10 (including each number in the case of additional number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The following circumstances, i.e., the assessment titleholder of the assessment land and the Plaintiff’s prior L is the same person: ① the assessment titleholder of the assessment land and the Plaintiff’s early L are identical to the Plaintiff’s early L; ② the legal domicile and the death price of the Plaintiff’s early L are indicated as Young-gun M, although the legal domicile and the death price are indicated in the Plaintiff’s early removal of the assessment land, the aforementioned removal was destroyed due to an incident of 625, and the Plaintiff’s remaining N on March 25, 1917.