All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. Determination on the grounds of appeal against Defendant A

A. The summary of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (a) seven traffic accidents have occurred for about two years including that Defendant A was subject to four traffic accidents only in 2008; (b) the above Defendant and Q are well-known to each other; (c) Q state that the above Defendant and Q is well-known to the delivery service employees; (d) Q state that the above Defendant and CSS’s office work officers are well-known to the Defendant and CS; and (e) state that the above Defendant was confirmed and circumvented; and (e) state that the said Defendant caused an accident without any contact; and (e) AP states that the said Defendant was facing the Plaintiff due to his own occurrence of the accident; and (b) states that the said Defendant intentionally paid the accident or claimed the insurance money, thereby deceiving the victim insurance company, and deceiving the insurance money by fraud, there is

B. First, the police interrogation protocol against Defendant A denies the contents of Defendant A, and the number indicated in Q’s interrogation protocol of the police interrogation protocol (the evidence as to No. 2 and No. 3 of the judgment of the court below against Defendant A, and the number indicated in the overall title is the number No. 50 of the crime committed by each Defendant.

(2) The prosecutor’s interrogation protocol (2, 3) on Q is inadmissible as evidence to the effect that Defendant A denies its content. Also, the prosecutor’s interrogation protocol on Q is inadmissible as evidence. The prosecutor’s interrogation protocol on the defendant’s suspect interrogation protocol on the defendant’s suspect interrogation protocol on the defendant’s suspect interrogation protocol (1 through 7), the witness AL’s partial legal statement (1), the witness R and U’s partial legal statement and T, each prosecutor’s interrogation protocol on the defendant’s suspect interrogation protocol on the defendant’s interrogation of the defendant’s interrogation protocol on the defendant’s interrogation of the prosecutor’s interrogation protocol on the defendant’s interrogation of the prosecutor’s interrogation protocol on Q, each part of the prosecutor’s interrogation protocol on the defendant’s interrogation of the police interrogation protocol on the defendant’s interrogation of the defendant’s interrogation protocol on the defendant’s interrogation of the defendant’s interrogation protocol on the defendant’s interrogation of the suspect interrogation protocol on AM, and the prosecutor’s protocol on AM on the defendant’s interrogation.