The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the person who was the representative of the residents prior to the 112-dong apartment complex, and the victim C is the female president of the same apartment complex.

On December 2, 2012, the Defendant entered the title "D, which connects to "D, which is a resident autonomous site," and enters into a contract with "merchants," and received money of 2,50 million won per year, and received money for the same kind of goods sold as "broadcast," with "I will receive fees of 1,50,000 won per broadcast." On February 2, 2015, the Defendant added the same title to the same site at the same place on "D," and "I will not sell 3,000 won during the broadcast process or 200,000 won, and will not sell 2,50,000 won for the reason that I would know that I would have received money from "I will sell 1,50,000 won for more than 2,000 won."

2. The facts charged in the instant case constitute a crime falling under Article 70(2) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc., which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s will specifically manifested pursuant to Article 70(3) of the same Act. The victim withdraws his/her wish to punish the Defendant by submitting a written withdrawal of complaint, stating that he/she voluntarily agreed with the Defendant, to the court on June 26, 2015, which was subsequent to the institution of the instant indictment, the victim voluntarily agreed to withdraw the complaint to the court, and thus, the indictment in the instant case is dismissed pursuant to Article